2. Why did it take so long for man to realize the dream of
flight?
The dream of flight was one of man’s most time-consuming
accomplishments because of a number of factors. Firstly, although all the
necessities for lighter-than-air flight were available to many of the world’s
earliest civilizations—such as in the case of the Condor I, constructed
using only traditional Inca materials in 1975—men were unable to imagine the
possibility of machines such as balloons and airships until the seventeenth
century and its discoveries of chemical gases because there were few to no examples
in nature of flight not powered with wings. Secondly, even when the first
balloons were demonstrated, for instance, by a Jesuit priest from Brazil before
the king of Portugal, these feats were dismissed as legendary due to long
distances and the difficulty of rapid communication; man had trouble believing
in the idea. Until the end of the eighteenth century, only Leonardo da Vinci
was really interested in flight. Finally, there were mistaken calculations,
such as when one researcher claimed that a flat, low-angled plate would not
generate enough lift to fly (or, at least, to fly easily), adding more
discouragement, or when John Smeaton represented the density of air in
aerodynamic equations with an inaccurate coefficient; it took Samuel Pierpont
Langley and the Wright brothers in the late nineteenth and early twentieth
centuries to fix his mistake. All of these circumstances together combined to
hamper and delay the development of flight.
4. What three methods of solving the challenge of flight
emerged by the late nineteenth century and how effective were they?
The first method was to move directly from research to the
construction of full-scale, powered and piloted aircraft, such as the Eole,
a steam-powered tailless monoplane which jumped 160 feet on launch in 1890, but
could not perform sustained or controlled flight. This approach had a certain
degree of success, but did not contribute significantly to the development of
flight, only of short soaring movements. The second approach was the design and
testing of model aircraft (as in the case of Alphonse Pénaud, who flew a
“planophore,” powered by rubber bands, in the Jardin des Tuileries and
accomplished a circular flight of 130 ft. This was the first public
demonstration of stable flight by a heavier-than-air machine). This method,
unfortunately, attracted little notice, and so made minor contributions to
development of flight. Thirdly, early aeronauts would attempt to fly through
the design and flight testing of piloted gliders, using air currents and not
generated power. This was very dangerous. For example, Louis Mouillard, a
French farmer and schoolteacher living in Algeria, flew 138 feet, but scared
himself to death because he couldn’t control his flight, and never attempted to
fly again (or, at least, died before he could attempt again). None of these
three methods was ultimately successful.
5. Why did Wilbur and Orville Wright achieve success before
their contemporaries?
The Wright brothers’ success was due, in the first place, to
their remarkable team dynamic. In the words of Wilbur: “From the time we were
little children…my brother and myself lived together, played together, worked
together and, in fact, thought together…nearly everything that was done in our
lives has been the result of conversations, suggestions and discussions between
us (p.56).”
However, they also proved themselves of a brilliant
analytical disposition, not only rapidly absorbing the existing research on the
subject of flight, but also discerning what was useful to them and what was
not. This allowed them to settle correctly on the central problem of the whole
heavier-than-air flight conundrum: equilibrium and balanced control. Their
experience in their shared bicycle shop had equipped them to dream up and
create lightweight, precisely tuned and balanced instruments and even measuring
devices, such as in their improved wind tunnel. Drawing a comparison between
riding a bicycle and directing an aircraft, they made it their goal to attack
the problem as if they were helping a beginning cyclist to handle his wheels.
Lastly and most importantly, they learned from their mistakes. Rather than
abandoning one failed idea for the next, they progressed by eliminating
unhelpful features while keeping helpful ones. For instance, they improved
their first glider designs by covering them with fabric and increasing wing
curvature. All of these determined, innovative qualities permitted the Wright
brothers to outstrip their contemporaries and amaze the world.
No comments:
Post a Comment