WINGS Assignment 5
Chapter 12-14
2. Discuss the beginning of supersonic flight research in
the United States and whether or not this technology was a priority.
The beginning of supersonic flight research
in the United States began in the fall of 1918 when researchers interested in
high-speed flight were working with high speed propellers going almost 6 times
the speed of the plane, high-speed wind tunnels, and aerodynamics in design.
Jacob Ackeret is credited with the completion of the Mach 2 which represented
the ratio of the speed of sound to the speed of an object in comparison. However,
any realized it was time to start back at the drawing boards when various
attempts did not work to replace usual piston engines with something that could
power such speeds; this lead to the supercharger.
From here came the development of
the jet engine. At this time the British still dominated the field of turbojet
technology. This would soon change; “By the early 1950w, the enormous U.S.
investment in research and development enabled American companies to pull ahead
of the Brits.” (p 453) However, the turbojet engine only effectively powered
high altitude, high speed flights. Research continued into developing efficient
high speed flight, faster than could have been imagined at the time. Eastman
Jacobs and Arthur Kantrowitz aimed to design the first true supersonic wind
tunnel. This quickly fell through due to NACA restrictions.
The aim was to learn about “aerodynamic
conditions close to the speed of sound” (p 455). While wind tunnels had been
developed producing these high speeds, even higher than the speed of sound,
John Stack believed that to truly gather information they must develop a plane
to fly faster than sound. The concern was the uncertainty surrounding this
proposition as to what would happen due to such a lack of knowledge. This factor
decreased the priority of the project for such a period of time. Finally in
1947, Captain Charles Yeager was the first to fly faster than the speed of
sound in the XS-I.
3. What role did the helicopter play in the development of
aviation technology?
The
helicopter solved the drawn out problem of vertical flight. There are a variety
of research and people that went into the success, and much like the first
flying machine, many had been working on it for a period of time before success
was reached. Advances in vertical flight started out as the autogiro developed
by Juan de la Cierva in 1923. This machine featured “a free-wheeling rotor at a
positive angle on top of a machine fitted with a conventional engine and
propeller mounted on the nose. The forward motion of the craft would turn the
rotor, lifting the machine into the air.” This was not considered the world’s
first helicopter due to its need for a short take off run.
Autogiros
were actually a relatively popular piece of machinery. Harold Pitcairn bought
the rights here to American manufacturing where he was convinced these could
replace the car in every garage as the average American’s means of transportation.
While we see today he was wrong, Pitcairn helped to develop a safer landing
mechanism and even autogiros capable of use on roads as well. Unfortunately the
development of the true helicopter before the onset of World War II had a
negative impact when he went to market his machines to the military.
In America,
Igor Sikorsky is greatly credited with the development of the practical helicopter.
Vertical flight had come this far but more was needing accomplished before
helicopters would see a true role. When technical issues were finally sorted
out, enthusiasm for the helicopter flourished across the states. The popularity
was combated with the fact that they were not easily flown and not practical to
have in the hands of average American’s.
The
helicopter played a role of further advances in aviation; it displayed a new
way of flight that had not yet been conquered including hovering. The helicopter became an important tool of war
to carry supplies as well as men into battle. With such effective vertical
mobility it made it possible to land without a strip and take off quickly from
the same position.
10. Support of refute the statement that aviation was the
most important military technology since the invention of gunpowder.
I would support the statement that
aviation was the most important military technology since the invention of
gunpowder. While maybe it is not as large of a revolution that the development
of gunpowder brought to military efforts overall, aviation changed the face of
war and conflict. It is amazing that within a few years conflict went from the
ground to the skies. People were able to fly across the ocean in hours rather
than days, and all continents were suddenly connected by this ability to fly. Planes
went from a flimsy wooden and fabric biplane to a tough metal monoplane capable
of flying high altitudes and high speeds while carrying people and supplies. We
saw from here the development of supersonic speeds, vertical flight, and rocket
power. While this advance in technology was a great advance for the military,
aviation also brought much destruction to the areas impacted. More destruction
came to the innocent civilians than any conflict had ever seen with airplanes
able to pinpoint bomb locations from across seas. We saw lives lost that should not have been
sacrificed, much like with what we see with gunpowder. With advances comes some
tragedy as well when these powerful weapons and tools get into the hands of
anger and vengeance.
We then see the airplane develop
into a commercial tool and exploratory tool. The advances continue over such a
short span of time that it would be arguable to say that aviation is even greater
and advancement than gunpowder. The examples of aviation that we have today are
unrecognizable compared to a century ago. We have whole museums dedicated to the
development of military aviation alone. In the beginning, we heard warnings of
the danger that aircraft could possess, but we also hear and see the great
knowledge and technology that they have brought to the world.
No comments:
Post a Comment