1. Did flight have any influence outside of aviation? If so,
how?
After flight emerged, it began to show up in literary
culture and artistic culture. Pablo Picasso and Georges Braque, for example,
started to watch the some of the first flights that occurred in France. This
sight inspired the two cubist painters to build model airplanes. Picasso was so
impacted by aviation that he wrote a commentary on how important aviation was
to “the defense of the nation” (p 122).
Poets and artists all over the world were fascinated by
aviation and some even wanted to try. An Italian, Futuristic poet, Filippo
Tommaso Marinetti, believed “artists should participate in technologies that
will shape the future” (p 122). Shortly after, Vasily Vasilyevich Kamensky, a
Russian writer, decided to move to Paris to learn to fly in an airplane he had
purchased. He ended up in an injury crash in 1912, but continued to lecture
society on airplanes and continued to write Futuristic poetry. Even though
Robert Delaunay, a French painter, was not at all correlated with Futuristic
ideals, aviation was still incorporated in his works.
Aviation influenced songs, novels, and theater productions
as well. Novels like Hike and the
Airplane by Sinclair Lewis were based off real aviation stories. There were
magazines, children’s books, and fictional novels all focused on aviation and
the public loved it. In the theater production The Aviator by George M.
Cohan, was a love story about a guy who has to prove that he is a good pilot in
order to keep the girl he loves. He had previously lied that he was a pilot. In
a climactic moment in the play, an actual Bleriot XI was wheeled on stage and
the engine was started!
Airplanes were showing up on anything to be sold to the
public. Consumer products such as glassware, clocks, cigarette cases, and
pencil cases began to be tagged with the image of the airplane. Children’s toys
were manufactured to be model airplanes, aeronautical games, and aviation
dolls. Aviation heavily influenced the arts and popular culture when flight was
coming about.
2. How did this new field of aviation affect science?
This new field of aviation drove scientists and engineers to
find why and how flight actually occurred. When the Wright brother built their
plane, they were meticulous in their experiments and their design, but how it
worked was not completely determined. The Wright brothers did not focus on the
theory or physics of the airplane, rather they focused on accomplishing flight.
Two people, John William Strutt and Daniel Bernoulli, began
independently studying the physics behind flight. Strutt observed a cylinder
will have resistance if put in a fluid stream. He also saw that a lifting force
was created when the cylinder was spun clockwise. This forced the fluid
molecules down with an equal and opposite force lifting up, as explained by Sir
Isaac Newton’s Third Law of Motion. Bernoulli, on the other hand, noticed that
differences in speeds between two moving streams above and below the cylinders
generated a lifting force. Both of these thoughts helped to explain the dynamics
of how lift is created.
The mathematical theory of flight was initiated by the
German mathematician Wilhelm Kutta when he presented a paper based on Otto
Lilienthal’s glider. Nikoli E. Joukowski, a Russian scientist, help further
form the basis for “the circulation theory of lift” (p 125). In 1894, Frederick
Lanchester presented his first paper on flight theory. Lanchester was an
English engineer who was a key researcher in explaining how lift was generated
solely from air circulating around a curved wing. A little over a decade later, he published Aerial Flight which was “his most
important book” (p 125).
A German engineer, Ludwig Prandtl, played a key role in the
dynamics of how wind flows over the wings of a plane. He was interested in
fluid dynamics and published one of the most important papers involving fluid
dynamics. Prandtl said that their was a thin “boundary layer” on the wing in
which there was motionless fluid. He discovered that the flow of wind was not
really affected by friction from the surface because of this boundary layer.
Once he discovered this, “the complex elements of wing theory fell into place
over the next decade and a half” (p 125).
The field of aeronautical physics and mathematics was
created for this new field of aviation.
5. In your opinion, did the Wright Brothers’ patent suits
affect the progress of aviation?
The Wright Brothers’ patent suits did affect the progress of
aviation, in a good way and a bad way. On the positive end of the spectrum, the
Wright Brothers’ patent forced those aeronautical engineers to create planes
that were new and innovative. They had to add their own little inventions and
technology so that it would not infringe on the patent. This may have urged
others to improve the design of the plane and, therefore, make it better. Maybe
it would have taken longer if the people designing the planes just went off
Wilbur and Orville’s ideas.
On the flip side, several years were wasted in patent fights
for the Wright Company. While they were in the patent fights, no thoughts went
into the development of the design to the Wright Brothers’ planes. Records show
that “between 1909 and 1917 the firm sold only twenty-six aircraft…” (p 147). Therefore,
their minds were not included into the further improvement of the airplane.
With Wilbur and Orville’s ideas, the airplane might have been developed and
sold quicker, especially in the United States. Also, if the Wright Brothers’
had not fought to stop all of those people whom they thought were copying their
ideas, the airplane could have been developed faster. If the people that were
suspected of infringing on the patent would not have been sued, they would have
been able to spend that time they spent in the legal system, instead, on
engineering their aircraft. Studies do show that not as many airplanes were created
in the US during the patent fights. This caused the United States to drop down
in the international aeronautical leadership of airplane production. I could
understand why the American public thought the Wright Brothers’ patent suits
delayed and hurt the development of the airplane.
No comments:
Post a Comment